<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Carnival of Real Estate #51</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realcentralva.com/2007/07/23/the-carnival-of-real-estate-51/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2007/07/23/the-carnival-of-real-estate-51/</link>
	<description>Tracking Charlottesville&#039;s Real Estate Market since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2007/07/23/the-carnival-of-real-estate-51/#comment-8417</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 17:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2007/07/23/the-carnival-of-real-estate-51/#comment-8417</guid>
		<description>Oh, no - I absolutely agree that we must disclose. I think that adding that signature - 
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Jane Doe, GRI, licensed salesperson in the Commonwealth of Virginia
Happy Daze Realty
1500 Sunshine Circle
Richmond, VA 23225
804-999-9999 Office
804-222-2222 Cell
&lt;/blockquote&gt;


to the end of every single form of communication is silly.

I&#039;m with you on the anonymous comments as well, but it&#039;ll probably take 5 years for us/them to work through the the right law/rules and by then, the &quot;professional&quot; bloggers will have (hopefully) already sorted things out their way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, no &#8211; I absolutely agree that we must disclose. I think that adding that signature &#8211; </p>
<blockquote><p>
Jane Doe, GRI, licensed salesperson in the Commonwealth of Virginia<br />
Happy Daze Realty<br />
1500 Sunshine Circle<br />
Richmond, VA 23225<br />
804-999-9999 Office<br />
804-222-2222 Cell
</p></blockquote>
<p>to the end of every single form of communication is silly.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you on the anonymous comments as well, but it&#8217;ll probably take 5 years for us/them to work through the the right law/rules and by then, the &#8220;professional&#8221; bloggers will have (hopefully) already sorted things out their way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardell DellaLoggia</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2007/07/23/the-carnival-of-real-estate-51/#comment-8416</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardell DellaLoggia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2007/07/23/the-carnival-of-real-estate-51/#comment-8416</guid>
		<description>Jim,

Any licensed real estate agent must make that fact clear, when spouting about real estate on a blog.  There we disagree.  How else is the public to know that the Bubble Blog advices are not from licensed people, if they can&#039;t distinguish between who is licensed and who is not?

Licensees should also NOT be permitted to be &quot;anonymous&quot;, whether they are the the blog host, or someone commenting on a blog.

The whole point of licensing is being able to track people who impact consumers.  Blogs are no exception, and no agent should be able to hide behind an anonymous comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>Any licensed real estate agent must make that fact clear, when spouting about real estate on a blog.  There we disagree.  How else is the public to know that the Bubble Blog advices are not from licensed people, if they can&#8217;t distinguish between who is licensed and who is not?</p>
<p>Licensees should also NOT be permitted to be &#8220;anonymous&#8221;, whether they are the the blog host, or someone commenting on a blog.</p>
<p>The whole point of licensing is being able to track people who impact consumers.  Blogs are no exception, and no agent should be able to hide behind an anonymous comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

