<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A bigger Charlottesville airport</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realcentralva.com/2008/01/18/a-bigger-charlottesville-airport/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2008/01/18/a-bigger-charlottesville-airport/</link>
	<description>Tracking Charlottesville&#039;s Real Estate Market since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: What are the Chances the Charlottesville Airport would Close? &#124; Real Central VA</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2008/01/18/a-bigger-charlottesville-airport/#comment-16725</link>
		<dc:creator>What are the Chances the Charlottesville Airport would Close? &#124; Real Central VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2008/01/18/a-bigger-charlottesville-airport/#comment-16725</guid>
		<description>[...] A bigger Charlottesville airport [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A bigger Charlottesville airport [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2008/01/18/a-bigger-charlottesville-airport/#comment-12117</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 12:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2008/01/18/a-bigger-charlottesville-airport/#comment-12117</guid>
		<description>After flying to Chicago once every 30 or 45 days and having problems about 70% of the time, I have chosen  to forgo CHO for the reliability, ease and competitive pricing of Richmond. I might be willing to pay for convenience, but getting stuck in Cincinnati, delayed in Charlotte, missing a plane at Dulles, all due to Charlottesville, aren&#039;t worth it. I&#039;ll drive, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After flying to Chicago once every 30 or 45 days and having problems about 70% of the time, I have chosen  to forgo CHO for the reliability, ease and competitive pricing of Richmond. I might be willing to pay for convenience, but getting stuck in Cincinnati, delayed in Charlotte, missing a plane at Dulles, all due to Charlottesville, aren&#8217;t worth it. I&#8217;ll drive, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Short Seller</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2008/01/18/a-bigger-charlottesville-airport/#comment-12077</link>
		<dc:creator>Short Seller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2008/01/18/a-bigger-charlottesville-airport/#comment-12077</guid>
		<description>CHO would do well to shore up the service it currently has rather than to focus on grandiose and unrealistic plans. (I fly between 75,000 and 100,000 miles a year, with departures scattered among IAD, RIC and CHO.) With $90/barrel oil forcing airline cutbacks and mergers, airlines are simply not looking to add service to small cities like Charlottesville. In fact, they are looking to consolidate it. I would be very surprised with the M&amp;A talk going around in the industry if CHO has the same amount of seats flying in and out each day 12 months from now as it currently does.
This airport authority has shown precious little foresight when it comes to its marketing efforts as it is. Remember the recent ad campaign promoting the comfort of travel through CHO relative to the &quot;low-cost&quot; service in RIC and Dulles? Makes you wonder if anyone in the airport&#039;s administration had ever flown on one of the commercial flights departing from CHO.
Let&#039;s see, the luxury and comfort of a circa-1981 Piedmont Dash 8 turboprop vs., say, a brand-new JetBlue Embraer 190 in Richmond with TVs at every seat for 1/2 of the price. 
Tough choice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHO would do well to shore up the service it currently has rather than to focus on grandiose and unrealistic plans. (I fly between 75,000 and 100,000 miles a year, with departures scattered among IAD, RIC and CHO.) With $90/barrel oil forcing airline cutbacks and mergers, airlines are simply not looking to add service to small cities like Charlottesville. In fact, they are looking to consolidate it. I would be very surprised with the M&amp;A talk going around in the industry if CHO has the same amount of seats flying in and out each day 12 months from now as it currently does.<br />
This airport authority has shown precious little foresight when it comes to its marketing efforts as it is. Remember the recent ad campaign promoting the comfort of travel through CHO relative to the &#8220;low-cost&#8221; service in RIC and Dulles? Makes you wonder if anyone in the airport&#8217;s administration had ever flown on one of the commercial flights departing from CHO.<br />
Let&#8217;s see, the luxury and comfort of a circa-1981 Piedmont Dash 8 turboprop vs., say, a brand-new JetBlue Embraer 190 in Richmond with TVs at every seat for 1/2 of the price.<br />
Tough choice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

