<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search For Homes With Basements in Charlottesville</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/02/search-for-homes-with-basements-in-charlottesville/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/02/search-for-homes-with-basements-in-charlottesville/</link>
	<description>Tracking Charlottesville&#039;s Real Estate Market since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/02/search-for-homes-with-basements-in-charlottesville/#comment-23898</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2008/12/29/search-for-homes-with-basements-in-charlottesville/#comment-23898</guid>
		<description>That sounds fine for now. Hopefully the Realtor system programmers can figure out a solution for the &quot;year built&quot; problem!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds fine for now. Hopefully the Realtor system programmers can figure out a solution for the &#8220;year built&#8221; problem!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/02/search-for-homes-with-basements-in-charlottesville/#comment-22763</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2008/12/29/search-for-homes-with-basements-in-charlottesville/#comment-22763</guid>
		<description>Wow, it would be fabulous to include a feature for &quot;first floor bedroom&quot;.  This is something only Realtors can search on in mycaar.  Thanks for your consideration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it would be fabulous to include a feature for &#8220;first floor bedroom&#8221;.  This is something only Realtors can search on in mycaar.  Thanks for your consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/02/search-for-homes-with-basements-in-charlottesville/#comment-22717</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2008/12/29/search-for-homes-with-basements-in-charlottesville/#comment-22717</guid>
		<description>Hmmm ... great question about whether some would be excluded. I was going to change the default &quot;minimum age&quot; to 1750, but did a quick search of homes in the MLS - 69 in the Central Virginia came back as older than 1750 ... 9 had actual &quot;year built&quot; as prior to 1750, the rest indicated the year built was zero.

It&#039;s a flaw with the system and the Realtors.

For now, I&#039;m going to leave it at zero (I can shift it myself in the back end), but don&#039;t want to risk eliminating any properties. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm &#8230; great question about whether some would be excluded. I was going to change the default &#8220;minimum age&#8221; to 1750, but did a quick search of homes in the MLS &#8211; 69 in the Central Virginia came back as older than 1750 &#8230; 9 had actual &#8220;year built&#8221; as prior to 1750, the rest indicated the year built was zero.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a flaw with the system and the Realtors.</p>
<p>For now, I&#8217;m going to leave it at zero (I can shift it myself in the back end), but don&#8217;t want to risk eliminating any properties. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/02/search-for-homes-with-basements-in-charlottesville/#comment-22692</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2008/12/29/search-for-homes-with-basements-in-charlottesville/#comment-22692</guid>
		<description>Thanks for adding the garage search feature!

I noticed a small bug when using the &quot;year built&quot; feature: since the range is so wide, the slider tools aren&#039;t usable. Year built goes from 0 to present. Maybe it should go ~1700 to present?  Would that exclude listings missing year built data? I wonder what the oldest home in the area is? (for some context Monticello=1772)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for adding the garage search feature!</p>
<p>I noticed a small bug when using the &#8220;year built&#8221; feature: since the range is so wide, the slider tools aren&#8217;t usable. Year built goes from 0 to present. Maybe it should go ~1700 to present?  Would that exclude listings missing year built data? I wonder what the oldest home in the area is? (for some context Monticello=1772)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

