<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Challenging the Status Quo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/</link>
	<description>Tracking Charlottesville&#039;s Real Estate Market since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: A New Direction - Nest Realty Group &#124; Real Central VA</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/#comment-25575</link>
		<dc:creator>A New Direction - Nest Realty Group &#124; Real Central VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/#comment-25575</guid>
		<description>[...] Status Quo, in the form of the established political &#8220;leaders&#8221; refuses to eliminate Single Agent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Status Quo, in the form of the established political &#8220;leaders&#8221; refuses to eliminate Single Agent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danilo Bogdanovic</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/#comment-23487</link>
		<dc:creator>Danilo Bogdanovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 05:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/#comment-23487</guid>
		<description>I agree that it&#039;s ashame that this issue continues to be put on the back-burner. I wonder why that&#039;s the case. Perhaps asking the question, &quot;Who gains from Dual Agency and who would lose the most if Dual Agency were banned?&quot; may help answer that question.

I sincerely hope that Ben is not correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it&#8217;s ashame that this issue continues to be put on the back-burner. I wonder why that&#8217;s the case. Perhaps asking the question, &#8220;Who gains from Dual Agency and who would lose the most if Dual Agency were banned?&#8221; may help answer that question.</p>
<p>I sincerely hope that Ben is not correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/#comment-23050</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/#comment-23050</guid>
		<description>Ben - 

I think you&#039;re probably right. What a shame that 1) I&#039;m left sort of hoping for a lawsuit to happen and 2) Our Association - State (and National) - do not have the foresight or gumption to do what is clearly - and objectively - right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben &#8211; </p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re probably right. What a shame that 1) I&#8217;m left sort of hoping for a lawsuit to happen and 2) Our Association &#8211; State (and National) &#8211; do not have the foresight or gumption to do what is clearly &#8211; and objectively &#8211; right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Martin, Va Assn of REALTORS</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/#comment-23037</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Martin, Va Assn of REALTORS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/#comment-23037</guid>
		<description>I personally think it may take someone getting sued and sentenced to put some urgency behind this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think it may take someone getting sued and sentenced to put some urgency behind this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/#comment-22599</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/#comment-22599</guid>
		<description>Jeremy - 

I know and agree about the pressing, but I disagree about the &quot;bulk of the membership.&quot; My gut tells me that a relative minority is on both ends of the argument - one side wants to keep things the way they were 10 years ago and one is kicking and screaming for change, but often to an audience of those who are so stuck on the status quo.

I don&#039;t know what the solution is, but I&#039;m not going to stop trying, and welcome anyone who advocates looking at things differently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy &#8211; </p>
<p>I know and agree about the pressing, but I disagree about the &#8220;bulk of the membership.&#8221; My gut tells me that a relative minority is on both ends of the argument &#8211; one side wants to keep things the way they were 10 years ago and one is kicking and screaming for change, but often to an audience of those who are so stuck on the status quo.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what the solution is, but I&#8217;m not going to stop trying, and welcome anyone who advocates looking at things differently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Hart</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/#comment-22592</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Hart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/#comment-22592</guid>
		<description>It takes a bulk of the membership pressing ... and pressing ... and pressing some more ... on the issue to initiate change.  

Nothing more to add here, I know, but I appreciate you bringing up the issue ... again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It takes a bulk of the membership pressing &#8230; and pressing &#8230; and pressing some more &#8230; on the issue to initiate change.  </p>
<p>Nothing more to add here, I know, but I appreciate you bringing up the issue &#8230; again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/#comment-22316</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/#comment-22316</guid>
		<description>Keith - 

And that&#039;s the thing - if this were a case of what&#039;s best for the profession and the consumer, it seems to be a no-brainer. Picking and choosing legal counsel doesn&#039;t seem to be good practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith &#8211; </p>
<p>And that&#8217;s the thing &#8211; if this were a case of what&#8217;s best for the profession and the consumer, it seems to be a no-brainer. Picking and choosing legal counsel doesn&#8217;t seem to be good practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/#comment-22310</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/01/19/challenging-the-status-quo/#comment-22310</guid>
		<description>My question Jim, is why is the VAR not listening to the counsel of Lem? The justification for dual agency is a monetary one, not a service one. If the VAR wants to remain relevant, it should be focusing on how to bring the reputation of Realtors up, and that means professionalism and ethics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question Jim, is why is the VAR not listening to the counsel of Lem? The justification for dual agency is a monetary one, not a service one. If the VAR wants to remain relevant, it should be focusing on how to bring the reputation of Realtors up, and that means professionalism and ethics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

