<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sued For Blogging about Publicly Available Information</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/02/20/sued-for-blogging-about-publicly-available-information/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/02/20/sued-for-blogging-about-publicly-available-information/</link>
	<description>Tracking Charlottesville&#039;s Real Estate Market since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:10:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/02/20/sued-for-blogging-about-publicly-available-information/#comment-25675</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/02/20/sued-for-blogging-about-publicly-available-information/#comment-25675</guid>
		<description>Daniel -

I see what you&#039;re saying, but think the MLS is a false comparison - public records are *public* records, and the MLS is a private organization.

Regarding my blog posts - I absolutely am concerned about my blog posts ... based on the little information available about this suit, I can see that I could be dragged down by this concept. Posting articles about public data is part of the freedom of the press, and this is where I would highlight my wearing of the &quot;journalism&quot; hat ... and hope that some organization with resources challenges this ruling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel -</p>
<p>I see what you&#8217;re saying, but think the MLS is a false comparison &#8211; public records are *public* records, and the MLS is a private organization.</p>
<p>Regarding my blog posts &#8211; I absolutely am concerned about my blog posts &#8230; based on the little information available about this suit, I can see that I could be dragged down by this concept. Posting articles about public data is part of the freedom of the press, and this is where I would highlight my wearing of the &#8220;journalism&#8221; hat &#8230; and hope that some organization with resources challenges this ruling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/02/20/sued-for-blogging-about-publicly-available-information/#comment-25655</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.realcentralva.com/2009/02/20/sued-for-blogging-about-publicly-available-information/#comment-25655</guid>
		<description>Jim: Just to play devil&#039;s advocate, what about information that someone makes publicly *accessible* but doesn&#039;t want that data publicly *distributed*.  i.e.  CAAR makes the MLS data publicly available via mycaar.com but does not allow anyone to repost that data anywhere else (I would know).  Or what about your blog articles that you make publicly available?  Obviously there is a big difference in linking to information and copying information, but it&#039;s a slippery slope.  We need to start making judges take Internet 101 classes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim: Just to play devil&#8217;s advocate, what about information that someone makes publicly *accessible* but doesn&#8217;t want that data publicly *distributed*.  i.e.  CAAR makes the MLS data publicly available via mycaar.com but does not allow anyone to repost that data anywhere else (I would know).  Or what about your blog articles that you make publicly available?  Obviously there is a big difference in linking to information and copying information, but it&#8217;s a slippery slope.  We need to start making judges take Internet 101 classes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

