I like ’em (prefer the top as well). I assume Greg’s referring to the spacing between the letters (a graphics person I am not). Seems to me the V and A do need to be smushed together a tad.
This has been a useful lesson in how a logo needs to be more than just some random parts put together, so in this case the initial logos did serve a purpose.
Thanks for stopping by, Brett. I agree that without the first logo, the second one wouldn’t have been as good as I think it is. I also would have doubted the second one more had I not been so disappointed with the first.
Greg Swann says
July 16, 2007 at 12:57Much beter! I’d loved to see the whole thing kerned, but they need to hit that cumberland gap between the V and the A, at a minimum.
larry cragun says
July 16, 2007 at 13:08Well done.
Michael Wurzer says
July 16, 2007 at 13:27I like these much more than the others.
Galen says
July 16, 2007 at 14:30Nice!
Jim Duncan says
July 16, 2007 at 17:00Thanks everybody – hearing so quickly from people whom I respect made the decision easy.
Thank you.
Athol Kay says
July 16, 2007 at 18:16Agree, much better. I like the top one better than the bottom one. Image seem better defined for being darker.
Jay Thompson says
July 16, 2007 at 20:52I like ’em (prefer the top as well). I assume Greg’s referring to the spacing between the letters (a graphics person I am not). Seems to me the V and A do need to be smushed together a tad.
Jennifer says
July 17, 2007 at 12:35Good work on the logo- it looks great!
Bret Harris says
July 21, 2007 at 06:46This has been a useful lesson in how a logo needs to be more than just some random parts put together, so in this case the initial logos did serve a purpose.
Jim Duncan says
July 23, 2007 at 07:56Thanks for stopping by, Brett. I agree that without the first logo, the second one wouldn’t have been as good as I think it is. I also would have doubted the second one more had I not been so disappointed with the first.