Are homebuyers and sellers the only ones who need transportation?

It would appear that Gov. Kaine thinks so. (thanks to Richmond Sunlight for pointing out this article)

Kaine is proposing a statewide 25-cent increase in the grantors tax, which is now 10 cents per $100 of assessed value, that owners pay on the sale of a house.

First, the grantor’s tax is paid based on the sales price of the house, not the assessed value.

Nuts and bolts – currently the median price in the Charlottesville area is about $275,000. Thus, the grantor’s tax paid by the seller on that particular transaction would be about $275 – and that’s a lot of money! If the tax is increased to 25 cents $687.50. Note also that this tax is paid only when a property sells (which is happening less and less frequently).

Make no mistake – Virginia’s (and the localities’) transportation systems need help; they need maintenance and they need new infrastructure – roads, bike paths, rail lines – but taxing only one segment of the population that uses the system is wrong. It is difficult to get hard, accurate data on what percentage of people in this area own their homes, but let’s assume it’s anywhere from sixty to seventy percent. Thirty to forty percent of people in the area won’t pay this tax, yet they will still use our roads, buses, etc. This is not a question of fair, but one of whether this is a reasonable proposal.

One reason that the grantor’s tax is proposed is because it is a bit of a hidden tax – it’s just another one of those fees that gets thrown together on the HUD-1 at closing. In the hot market, no one questioned the tax; now every nickel counts.

Why not a broad-based tax that everyone would pay (gas tax), other than lack of political and intestinal will and fortitude?

To target one segment of the population for a tax that needs to be focused on the entire population, regardless of the state of the housing market, is not right.

The best prediction from the Washington Post article goes to lobbyist Charlie Davis

“At the end of the day, maybe putting a ‘lockbox’ on transportation funds, maybe a local taxing authority, but that is it. Give Kaine credit for pushing for something. The Republicans can be tagged as obstructionists but . . . Kaine came back with almost the identical plan that was shot down last year, so which is more foolhardy? But the session will provide ample opportunity for a lot of social interaction to discuss the presidential campaign and enjoy some wonderful cuisine at the Capitol snack bar.”

And he’s probably right.

Related posts

Whom should we tax?

A few Transportation bills

Too funny not to post – Copy of the Republican Transportation Plan

Update 06/24/2008: C-Ville has a good article about the state of the transportation debate, including this:

In the event that Kaine’s latest bill goes through unscathed (which is about as likely as UVA winning this year’s NCAA football championship), we the people of Virginia would have the pleasure of paying: 1 percent more when we buy a car; $10 more for annually registering our cars; and, when we sell our homes, a 250 percent higher “grantor’s tax,” which would go from 10 to 35 cents per $100 of assessed value. Most of the $1 billion generated annually would go to highway maintenance, but the revenue from the grantor’s tax increase—about $150 million annually—would go toward mass transit.

(Visited 4 times, 1 visits today)

4 Comments

  1. Chad Huck June 23, 2008 at 14:42

    Jim, I would be livid if I were a home buyer in your area. Even though I would be glad to pay another way (Charlotte has a 1/2 cent transit tax that was approved by the voters), it is not right for only home buyers to foot the bill. Has Gov. Kaine looked at the percentages of who rides public transportation? Homeowners vs Renters?

    Keep us posted on the outcome.
    -Chad

    Reply
  2. Frank June 25, 2008 at 10:28

    The sales transfer tax in Washington State is about 1.8% of the sale price so on a $300,000 sale the seller pays $5400. Now that is serious money. The tax Virginia is looking at is nothing. States need money and Virginia as a growing state needs better roads and transportation links.

    Reply
  3. Jim Duncan June 25, 2008 at 11:18

    Frank –

    Thank you for the comment. My issue with the grantor’s tax is not its relative size, but the fact that it’s not targeted at the broad spectrum of users.

    I have yet to see a rational argument for the grantor’s tax.

    Reply
  4. Pingback: Are Homebuyers and Sellers the Only Ones Who Need Transportation? Or Mass Transit? | VARbuzz

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *